06 July 2010

Minus the Plusses

I have a feeling that magic items may be more interesting sans modifier. Take away the plusses and minuses, and you get away a large part from the "magic item store" problem that many people have run into, and the stinginess inherent in the thought that multiple magic items will "ruin" campaign balance.

For example, imagine a Holy Avenger without its plusses; a sword that "merely" penetrates the defenses of magical evil creatures and is able to dispel magic. Or, one of my personal favorites, the Frost Brand. Minus its bonus to attack and damage, it would merely shine when freezing cold, possess the power to put out fires, and deal extra damage against hot creatures.

Of course, magic items are still sharper and more deadly than nonmagical ones, and they have a certain property that allows them to strike more often by virtue of being of superior balance or enchantment. It perhaps isn't too much to allow magical items to grant a blanket +1 to attack and damage, or maybe +2. Maybe even +1 to attack and +2 to damage?

The net effect should be to roughly equalize all the magical items, and to make properties more important than bonuses, such that situation and player preference is more important than superior bonus, and to make the game incapable of providing magical items that characters discard at the first opportunity upon finding a brand new magical item and the problems that brings to any sort of self-consistent gameworld.

3 comments:

  1. I have longed wondered if magic items would better retain their wonder if they manifested as situational rather than universal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoy it when magic items are less "generic" too. One (potential) pitfall of an approach like the one above is if magic swords are still relatively common, then you'll run into fighters carrying half a dozen of them in a golf bag to pick and choose from.

    "Hmm, a salamander? Let's see, looks like a nine ir- I mean, frost brand." :)

    Of course, if you make magic weapons and armor too rare, then it can make non spell-casting PCs weaker over time. The game assumes that by the time that a fighter has reached mid levels, he has an AC near zero (or better) and at least one magic weapon at his disposal. Too many powerful critters are simply unkillable with the ol' "+1 or better to-hit."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry! without the ol' "+1 or better to-hit."

    ReplyDelete

Looking Back

They say that if you don't look back at who who were from a year ago and cringe that you haven't grown enough. What if I look back f...